Jacobs, H.H. (2010). New School Versions: Reinventing and
Reuniting School Program Structures. Curriculum 21: Essential Education For A Changing World.
This
could be one of the most radical pieces of work that I have ever read! When I
read it, I felt as if all our reform work has been just readjustment of a
prison cell, and nothing more. And then comes the lady who breaks open the cell
itself! “New school designs, and even the reformation of existing school
programs, need to do more than stay out of the box—they need to dump the box
entirely.” (Jacobs, p.21)
As
per (Jacobs, p.2), there are 4 key structures that are set up for creating a
school and these are: “Schedule (long term and short term; Grouping
patterns of learners (institutional and instructional); Grouping patterns of
professionals (multiple affiliations) and Space (both physical and virtual)”.
A
school functions best when it takes these as 4 parts of a whole,
interdependent, instead of each having a track of its own, independent of
others. For this she has given (a) a macro view, taking examples from how
students of different countries can learn together using technology; and (b) a
micro view, where an individual teacher in a class can play around with space,
curriculum, scheduling and groupings in a blended format with structure and
freedom hand in hand.
This
reminds me, on a micro level, of a teacher I knew in a school that is in a
forest in south of India (Krishnamurti
Foundation India, n.d.). His students, tired of classroom once, asked if
they could sit on a tree and work. He agreed and the class happened on a tree,
with students and the teacher perched on different branches. He was a maths
teacher and students were working on problems, all completely in harmony. If a
student needed work to be corrected, he or she passed the notebook branch by
branch to the teacher. Passers-by observed, smiled and walked on. The tree
chosen of course was one that was huge (this school has trees as far as 100
years old) and steady with enough branches for 20 students.
The
teacher had broken the cell! Within the structure of schedule and curriculum,
he allowed flexibility in grouping and space. “Form should follow function”(Jacobs,
p.21). His objective was that students need to learn. How and where it does not
matter.
The classroom of
the future would be dictated by the learner. The question at the heart would be
‘What is it that best serves this learner right now?’ And not a system or an
ism.
However,
one may wonder, when is the learner ready to take such decisions as are in his
or her best interest?
On
a macro level, deep into south of India, there is a school, SAICE (Centre of Education, 1999). Curriculum
in this school is divided into 2 phases: (a) run by the teachers and (b) run by
the students.
The
children work on developing their skills from their childhood, till about 14
years of age. This is led by the teachers. This is phase 1.
Phase
2: Once they have reached a certain level of clarity, competency and maturity,
they take over their lives. They decide the group, the subjects, the teacher
and the schedule. The role of the teacher is that of a facilitator, there to
lead and not instruct. Students decide who they wish to learn from among the
choices.
The
curriculum and school structure is loosely held, ready to be changed if so
required. If a student is unhappy with a teacher or subject, he or she is
permitted to change it.
There
is a blend of structure and fluidity. The overall schedule of the school is
loosely structured: there is time to study, learn a hobby, play and meditate.
Hence development of mind, emotions, body and spirit is encouraged. But the
detailing is left to the students. There are no exams from kindergarten to PG
but the certificate is acceptable throughout the world.
However,
this school has maximum 10 students per group. Teachers start complaining if it
goes more than 7 or 8. There is no special needs section as each child is
special and unique programs can be developed for each of them.
I
do not know if such a model can be replicated everywhere. However, this seems
to be a school that broke the forms in which most of the schools are caught. It
has created a perfect blend of structure and freedom.
“Form
should follow function” (Jacobs, p.21) is something that has broken the
cells of my way of thinking! I used to think, till now, that I have done a lot
of work in education. However, it seems like I have just babbled like a child so
far and have a long way to go!
References
Comments