The Overt and Covert Curriculum
Pathways World school, Aravalli
IBMYP program (International
Baccalaureate, IBO, n.d), Mathematics
Section 1: Work that is influenced by external factors, such as community or structure of a school. This is the planned curriculum. “Formal curriculum is often referred to as planned learning experiences and can include the content to be learned as prescribed by authority”. (UNESCO, 2004)
Section 2: Work that is independent, that is my own belief
system that I take to classes. This is the unplanned and hidden curriculum. “Informal
curriculum is unplanned curriculum, the interactions and experiences
that happen daily in our classrooms. Hidden curriculum is about attitudes and
beliefs that are attached to what we learn and teach”. (UNESCO, 2004)
I think that Section 2
happens within the bounds of section 1. There is a lot of tug of war happening
all the time between planned and unplanned curricula.
We do yearly planning as a
team, the department teachers, with inputs from the head of department,
principal and also the school director. The director is the conduit for
influence from the parents and the larger society. This is where the big idea
becomes clear. What is expected of us. Our school director has had an
international exposure and is a big-time supporter of group work among adults.
He believes that “…group work or cooperative exercise
where deportment, or collaborative or cooperative skills are discussed,
used, and emphasized qualifies as having the potential for affective growth.”
(Wilson, 2016, p4) This has led to some good teamwork among us, though we
argue a lot over what goes and what does not go in curricula. J
I
find that the team gravitates more towards cognitive domain primarily. “It is
the “thinking” domain. This domain focuses on intellectual skills and is
familiar to educators.” (Kasilingam, Ramalingam, & Chinnavan, 2014, p14). Whereas
“I believe teachers should attempt to construct more holistic lessons by using all
3 domains in constructing learning tasks.” (Wilson, 2016, p1). Since our
subject is Maths, the teachers feel that cognition is the only thing they need
to care about. Add to that in India, Maths is considered the god of all
subjects, for maths related careers are highest held by public opinion
(Banerjee, 2017), we are always under pressure from parents to have higher
scores. My department believes that having affective domain involved would be
time consuming.
Section 2
The unplanned curriculum or the hidden curriculum
(UNESCO, 2004) is where there is no roadmap. “It
is thinking about teaching and learning in new and different ways. There is no
beginning or end. It is a process, and as such it continually develops.
Therefore, there is no one correct way to do it. There is no cookbook, recipe,
and ingredient that will work all the time.” (UNESCO, p8)
I was quite proud of myself and my prowess in the
three domains till I came to unit 4! Now I realize that my main focus is on
Cognitive domain, since I am a Maths teacher. However, I use the affective
domain to provide the right stimulus to get the students interested in learning
and also stay interested in it. I connect Maths to emotions “Since emotion draws both attention and channels
strong residual memory”. (Wilson, 2016, p4)
Cognitive domain comes easy
through problem solving and having an interactive class. I bring in the
affective domain by bringing in chiefly 3 strategies:
1.
Integrating Maths
with arts (visual, role play, singing). For example, present a concept in a
dramatic way to the class. Or draw a logo based on your life using symmetry.
2.
Integrating Maths
with English (vocabulary, concept summary). For example, write all words
associated with ‘Triangles’ and create a word game.
3.
Changing settings
in class (“…including whole-class, small group, and
individual learning” (Teach for America, n.d), p1). Rotate between different settings. For example, I teach the whole
class, then they break into small groups to discuss their learning and solve
problems cooperatively and then I take a short 4 min test to check individual
clarity.
The prevalent domain out of cognitive and affective keeps fluctuating.
It depends on the group psychology, topic in hand and time available. As I am
an extremely reflective teacher I am someone who “…
observes his or her own teaching, what is happening in the learning process and
makes a critical assessment as to what is working and what is not.” (UNESCO, p4). That is my base. The domains depend on the situation. I am
a big believer of “mindfulness in the classroom” (Zinn, 2013)
Psychomotor is a challenge. Understanding from
(Wilson, 2016, p5) I have been using the physical domain a lot. I keep the
students moving. I also give them a lot of flexible physical space environment.
(UNESCO, p46). That has been very rewarding. To observe students carve out
their own personal physical spaces has worked in my favour.
I believe that it is indispensable for my subject
at least. A lot of students have maths anxiety (MA). “MA is a debilitating emotional reaction to
mathematics that is increasingly recognised in psychology and education.”
(Szucs, 2019) I have tackled this to a large extent by using multiple domains.
I am getting the title of ‘the teacher with who maths fear disappears’ and I
would give the credit to my exposure to international education through the IB (IBO,
n.d) school and coming in touch with multiple domains. I am now a firm believer
that “…teachers should attempt to construct more
holistic lessons by using all 3 domains in constructing learning
tasks.” (Wilson, 2016, p1)
Maths is an abstract subject belonging to cognitive
domain chiefly. Hence integration of other domains is a must to be able to
reach out to all students. You can make the classes sensorially appealing for
it helps in “…forming of associations (connections)
between sensory experiences (perceptions of stimuli or events) and neural
impulses (responses) that manifest themselves behaviourally”, (Schunk, p73) the
behaviour expected here being that of being open to the challenge of doing
Math.
I thought that I used psychomotor learning, however
now I realize that I used physical and not psychomotor (Wilson, 2016, p5). I do
a lot of Maths with physical movement. And I discovered that “"The children learn more if they move and
use the whole body to learn.” (Bergland, 2017)
Psychomotor is definitely included, and that is
anything where there is drawing work required using tools – Geometry or Statistics.
For example, “Construct a triangle with all 3 sides given”, requires a whole
lot of psychomotor skills by using a protractor and ruler. “Construct a Bar
Graph” requires use of a ruler and pencil.
In other, I have tried it by integrating art to
Maths (#). For example, I took art works from ‘Sacred geometry design
sourcebook’ (Rawles, 2017) and asked students to construct them perfectly
(imbibing geometry through psychomotor) and then colour them as they wished to
(affective domain).
Psychologists have failed to find any one theory that
explains learning differences. (Peterson, 2006, p6). My style is a combination of Multiple Intelligences (Gardener, 2011))
and ATL skills from IBO (MYP, 2014, p20). I like to call it ‘variety and novelty’
as given by Eric Jensen (Jensen, 2005). I don’t think that it represents a
learning domain as it is a mix of everything. My objective is to “In a way, it’s just shaking up the classroom so it’s a
better fit for more kids.” (UNESCO, p8)
I believe “…that the most fundamental
type of learning involves the forming of associations (connections)
between sensory experiences (perceptions of stimuli or events) and neural
impulses (responses) that manifest themselves behaviourally”. (Schunk, 2012,
p73) Hence having a variety of learning experiences drawn from all domains of
learning is my way. I have an adaptable framework. What I find that within it
all students find a way to emotionally connect to Maths and be receptive to
learning. It serves the purpose.
- Banerjee, Arghya. 2017. Why India’s obsession over engineering as a career must end Retrieved from: https://medium.com/@arghyaban/why-indias-obsession-over-engineering-as-a-career-must-end-b7319065c375
- Bergland, Christopher. 2017. Motor Skills, Movement, and Math Performance Are Intertwined. Retrieved from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-athletes-way/201702/motor-skills-movement-and-math-performance-are-intertwined
- Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books,2011. Jensen, Eric. 2005. Teaching with the brain in mind. ASCD; Revised 2nd edition
- Kasilingam, G., Ramalingam, M. & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve student’s learning in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.jyoungpharm.org/sites/default/files/10.5530-jyp.2014.1.5.pdf
- International Baccalaureate, IBO, n.d. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/middle-years-programme/ MYP. 2014. From Principles to Practice. International Baccalaureate Organization, United Kingdom.
- Rawles, Bruce (2016). Sacred geometry design sourcebook. Elysian publishing (4th ed).
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Szucs, D. Understanding Maths anxiety. Retrieved from: https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/print/3960
- Teach for America (n.d.) Teaching as leadership: Differentiate your plans to fit your students. Retrieved from http://teachingasleadership.org/sites/default/files/How_To/PP/P-4/P4_Trad_v_Diff_Classroom.pdf
- Theories of Learning and Teaching; What Do They Mean for Educators? Suzanne M.Wilson; Michigan State University; and Penelope L. Peterson; Northwestern University
- UNESCO (2004). Changing teaching practices: Using curriculum differentiation to respond to students’ diversity. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001365/136583e.pdf
- Wilson, O. L. (n.d). The second principle. Retrieved from http://thesecondprinciple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Three-domains-of-learning-10-2016.pdf
- Zinn, Jon Kabat. A classroom in the now. Retrieved from: https://www.mindful.org/jon-kabat-zinn-a-classroom-in-the-now/
Comments