Every teacher should have a philosophy!
My
Philosophy for Globally Oriented Education
“During the middleschool years, young teens undergo multiple physical, social emotional, andintellectual changes that shape who they are and how they function as adults”. This is the time when seeds of the adult life are
sown and sprouted. Middle school is a space of tension because of “…the need
for middle schools to ease the transition from elementary school, with an
emphasis on the developmental needs of young teens, versus the need to
facilitate the transition to high school, with an emphasis on academic rigor”,”,
(Juvonen et al). And this is when I taught maths to students!
It
may seem very narrow to some, but my curricular decisions, developments and all
that I have done in education was provoked by the utter phobia for maths I saw
among a lot of students in my classes. Phobia “…may be defined as a feeling of
anxiety that stops one from efficiently tackling mathematical problems”,
(Raghunathan, 2012). They were riddled with low self-esteem, believing that
they are fools because they are not good at maths, and would often chase me for
few marks after each summative to get their overall grade up. I believed with
all my heart that this was something very false in education, although I was a
new teacher, all of 23 years and did not know what to do!
My
work to face this over 20 years spent in the classrooms of schools spanning
traditional education, free progress and IB resulted in chiseling out my
philosophy. This was based on ‘humane connection’, for “…what you realize is that connection is why we're here. It's what gives purpose and meaning to our lives”. I realized that for me, the purpose of
education was to learn to build humane connection with the students or
relationships. “And to me, the hard part of the one thing that keeps us out of
connection is our fear that we're not worthy of connection” (Brown). The students with low self-esteem did not believe that I would accept
them and I would keep hearing, ‘I can’t believe that you talk to me for I suck
at math!’
My
philosophy has been chiseled out at two levels, Inner and Outer.
The
Inner – Mindful Relationships
“Mindfulness meditation asks us to suspend
judgment and unleash our natural curiosity about the workings of the mind,
approaching our experience with warmth and kindness, to ourselves and others”,
(Getting started with mindfulness). This is what helped me to be aware of
my own conditioned response to some students and get over it. That in turn
worked towards accepting them fully and build a relationship of acceptance by
suspending my judgment. I look at students as human beings in full
expansiveness and not through the small window of ‘performance in maths’. I
opened myself, learnt to live “…with vulnerability and to stop controlling and
predicting”, (Brown). “Vulnerability is basically
uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure".
This relaxed the
students, adolescents, as my base is middle school, for they felt accepted
unconditionally. The sense of safety that they felt enhanced learning. “"From a neuroscience perspective, learning is a
change in the receptivity of cells brought about by neural connections
formed, strengthened, and connected with others …” (Schunk). To expose myself emotionally, I stepped off my authority as a
maths teacher and became one of the adults with the kids. It was a risk for
having an attitude of ‘I love you as you are’ could have had students taking it
easy, but surprisingly it never happened!
Not only did I
connect with them, I also made it a culture of the classes for students to be
kind and empathic to the others. As the schools I worked in were inclusive
school, I found that it was needed for students to be empathic to each other. I
did whatever was needed for this, such as (a) going out into the field and
playing cricket with the class, (b) trying different types of collaborative
learning, (c) bringing in buddy system in the classes or (d) having extensive
discussions with the students on relating to each other. It was not very hard
as students of middle school are open to listening to rational perspectives if
conveyed positively. This is what sowed the seeds for the global mind-set of
empathy, compassion and kindness among the students.
The
Outer – The curricula
The
outer is how I teach maths. The tools and techniques of teaching and assessing.
“Two factors strongly influence whether the brain pays attention to a piece of
information: (1). If the information has meaning. (2). If the information
causes an emotional response”, (Sun Protection Outreach by Students).
To
make maths classes meaningful, I brought in context in maths by answering each
time the question ‘why are we learning this?’ was raised by the students. “…to make learning meaningful—and thereby build
more extensive neural connections—teachers should incorporate context
as much as possible” (Schunk). I brought in real life applications to answer the questions incessantly
put by the students. I brought in History to give a perspective to the
evolution of maths. I made them explore the ‘what, why, how, who and where’ of
maths.
"Youcan take any unit and change it a little so that students really start to seethe world globally,". I integrated maths with global issues.
For example, data handling became the time to explore population growth; ratio
brought in human sex ratio; calculus brought in the question of war as the time
of innovation and symmetry brought in a deep reflection of teenage life,
(Kochar, 2011).
To
make the class emotionally positive, I used variety of strategies.
Collaboration, flip the class, use of colours in the notebooks, projects,
self-assessment, peer assessment and problem solving. There was also a steady
rhythm created by the routine of work with feedback on regular basis. As I
moved from national to international curriculum, the diversity of students
widened more and more. In attempting to include all kinds of learners, my
toolbox of strategies grew. Gradually my classes were an integration of life
skills, Multiple Intelligence and Perspective.
Conclusion
What
kind of a human am I creating? The road to my philosophy stems from trying to
answer this question. It is an exploration and an inquiry into my own mind-set
to question the kind of human-being I am moving towards. As the layers of
conditioning peeled off, I realized “…that vulnerability is the core of shameand fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it’s alsothe birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, of love”. When I stand before a student deeply open emotionally, a connection is
formed and creativity explodes fully into it.
Comments